结论 - iPhone AiriPhone Air 的超薄设计和优质做工给我们留下了深刻印象，但超薄设计也付出了代价：电池、摄像头和音效只能用平庸来形容，而高昂的价格和缺乏 USB 3.2 和双扬声器等功能则破坏了整体印象。
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
对设计和便携性要求较高的用户来说，Air 是一款时尚的生活设备，但专业机型更适合高级用户和相机发烧友。总的来说，Air 仍然是一个大胆的设计选择，但也有明显的妥协，其外形比功能更能打动我们。
Pros+ 轻薄设计
+ 高性能
+ 通过 IP68 认证
+ 明亮准确的显示屏Cons- 只有一个摄像头
- 只有一个摄像头一般有一个摄像头
- 电池寿命一般
- PWM 调光
价格和供应情况iPhone Air 有各种颜色和存储空间，包括黑色、黑色和白色。Apple，但在撰写本评论时，亚马逊上还没有提供。
Table of Contents结论 - iPhone Air规格：Apple iPhone Air保护壳 - iPhone Air 采用钛金属和陶瓷保护壳功能 - 仅适用于 iPhone Air 的 USB 2.0软件 - 面向欧洲的 Pared backApple Intelligence通信和全球导航卫星系统 - iPhone 配备 Wi-Fi 7电话功能和语音质量摄像头 - iPhone Air 仅提供两个镜头配件和保修 - Care+ 专业版价格输入设备和操作 - iPhone Air 和 Face ID 显示屏--明亮的新型中型 OLED 面板 性能 - iPhone Air 的图形处理器较弱排放 - iPhone 采用单声道扬声器电池续航时间 - 3,149 毫安时的超薄电池Notebookcheck 总体评分可能的替代品比较
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Apple iPhone Air 是同类产品中的首款，有三种存储版本：
存储
价格
256 GB
$999
512 GB
1199 美元
1,024 GB
1,399 美元
零售价仅比 iPhone 17 Pro 低 100 美元 iPhone 17 Pro我们的评测强调了不得不做出的妥协。Air 也是Apple 欧洲首款放弃 nano-SIM 卡支持的 iPhone，以延长电池寿命。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格：Apple iPhone Air
Apple iPhone Air (iPhone 17 Series)ProcessorApple A19 Pro, 2 x 4.3 GHz Apple A19 P-Core, 4 x 2.6 GHz Apple A19 E-CoreGraphics adapterApple A19 Pro 5-Core GPUMemory12 GB , LPDDR5xDisplay6.50 inch 19.54:9, 2736 x 1260 pixel 463 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, Super Retina XDR, Anti-reflective coating, Ceramic Shield 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorageApple 512GB NVMe, 512 GB , 480.75 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Baromater, Gyro, Accelerometer, Proximity, Dual ambient light, Face ID, OTG, Thread, UWB (Gen. 2)Networking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 8, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 70, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 5.64 x 156.2 x 74.7Battery12.26 Wh, 3149 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.894 V, MagSafe, Qi2, Battery Cycles: 1000Chargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemApple iOS 26CameraPrimary Camera: 48 MPix (26 mm, f/1.6, sensor-shift optical image stabilization)Secondary Camera: 18 MPix (Center Stage camera, f/1.9, AF)Additional featuresSpeakers: Mono, USB-C-Cabel, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC | Dual-Band-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | Dual-eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 34.05 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT, FAT32, exFAT, APFS, APFS (encrypted), macOS Extended (HFS+) | Body-SAR: 1.49 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.49 W/kg | max. charging speed: 20 W (wired) / 20 W (wireless), fanless, waterproofWeight165 g
Price1449 EuroLinksApple homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
保护壳 - iPhone Air 采用钛金属和陶瓷保护壳iPhone Air 采用超薄设计，是Apple 迄今最薄的智能手机。它的标称厚度为 5.64 毫米，我们可以通过测量确认这一点。加上大幅度的凸起（+2.96 毫米）和安装在顶部的摄像头（额外+2.7 毫米），其最厚处的厚度为 11.3 毫米。不过，iPhone Air 的重量仅为 165 克，相对较轻。
Apple iPhone Air 的边框采用了高度抛光的钛合金。虽然看起来很光滑，但相应地也容易留下指纹。正面使用的是 Ceramic Shield 2 保护玻璃，而背面使用的仍然是第一代的旧版本。尽管设计纤薄，Air 却非常坚固，能无声无息地抵御扭转。iPhone Air 的制造质量非常出色，缝隙紧密一致，89% 的屏占比也给我们留下了深刻印象。
iPhone Air 符合 IP68 防水标准，防水深度达 6 米，有以下几种颜色可供选择：iPhoneAir 有以下几种颜色：太空黑、云白、浅金和天蓝， 我们的评测机采用的是后一种颜色。不过，根据光线角度的不同，它也会显得更白而不是更蓝。
尺寸比较
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Apple iPhone Air Apple iPhone 17 Pro DIN A6 ❌
功能 - 仅适用于 iPhone Air 的 USB 2.0就像 iPhone 17、Air 也只支持 USB 2.0，无法进行视频输出。因此，数据传输速度之慢可想而知。
除此之外，Air 的蓝牙 6.0、NFC、UWB 和 Wi-Fi 7 使其与 Pro 机型相当。
iPhone Air（左）与 iPhone 16 Pro Max 相邻 软件 - 面向欧洲的 Pared backApple IntelligenceiPhone Air 搭载的是Apple iOS 26，与其他 2025 款 iPhone 的版本相同。
Apple 虽然苹果公司还没有就提供更新的问题发表任何具体声明，但我们可以假定它至少会提供五年的更新，如果考虑到欧盟的新规定，甚至至少会提供六年的更新。
可持续性Apple 提供有关https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/iphone/iPhone_Air_PER_Sept2025.pdf的详细信息，Air 型号也不例外。它采用无塑料包装，还参加了自我维修计划。.
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - iPhone 配备 Wi-Fi 7iPhone Air 支持广泛的蜂窝网络频率，几乎可以在全球任何地方建立连接。在城市地区接收效果良好。
它采用最新的 Wi-Fi 标准 Wi-Fi 7，支持所有三个频段。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时，尽管 6 GHz 频段在接收数据时可能会更快一些，但数据传输速度还是很稳定的。
NetworkingApple iPhone Air802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
903 (min: 652) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
739 (min: 702) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1661 (min: 1520) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1281 (min: 1244) MBit/s ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
898 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1870 (min: 1828) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1500 (min: 1463) MBit/s ∼95%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
834 (min: 647) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
824 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1667 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1216 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼77%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
990 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 1183) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
942 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1051 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1280 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1447 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000
702 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
727 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1375 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼87%
Apple iPhone Air 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1661 (1520-1688) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1870 (1828-1899) Apple iPhone Air 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1281 (1244-1302) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1499 (1463-1524) Apple iPhone Air 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø903 (652-956) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø883 (453-928) Apple iPhone Air 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø738 (702-770) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø808 (798-819)
iPhone Air 使用双频全球导航卫星系统（GNSS）与所有主要卫星网络连接来确定自己的位置。位置跟踪速度相当快，但在骑车的实际测试中，智能手机检索位置的时间间隔明显较长，这意味着路线跟踪并不总是准确的。不过，它仍然完全能够满足导航目的。
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：城市地区
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结电话功能和语音质量Apple iPhone Air 支持双 eSIM 卡，但不再有实体 SIM 卡。VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能仍然可用。
将设备放在耳边时通话质量不错，但降噪效果一般。
摄像头 - iPhone Air 仅提供两个镜头与 iPhone Air 自拍iPhone Air 配备了其他 2025 机型的全新 Center Stage 摄像头，照片和视频效果良好（最高 4K @ 60fps）。
手机后部只容纳了一个摄像头。任何期待与 iPhone 17 Pro 相同摄像头的人都会失望，因为Apple 决定整合 iPhone 17 中功能稍逊的摄像头。虽然我们可能会被指责吹毛求疵，但考虑到价格区间，这无疑是合理的。iPhone 拍出的照片效果不错，但在动态范围和景深方面暴露出不足。变焦功能在放大到 2 倍时效果不错，但超过 2 倍后，图像很快就会变得像素化。视频最好以 60fps 的超高清速度和杜比视界（Dolby Vision）录制。
与 17 Pro 不同，Air 的慢动作录制仅限于 240fps 的全高清，完全没有电影视频模式，也没有 ProRAW 和 ProRes 视频。融合相机功能可利用 26、28 和 35 毫米镜头。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow lightclick to load imagesApple iPhone AirXiaomi 15 UltraOnePlus 13Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesApple iPhone AirXiaomi 15 UltraOnePlus 13Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesApple iPhone AirXiaomi 15 UltraOnePlus 13Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesApple iPhone AirXiaomi 15 UltraOnePlus 13Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
2.1 ∆E3.2 ∆E3.1 ∆E3.9 ∆E3.3 ∆E4 ∆E2.4 ∆E3.4 ∆E5.4 ∆E4.6 ∆E2.6 ∆E2.8 ∆E4.5 ∆E3.3 ∆E3.9 ∆E2.3 ∆E2.5 ∆E7.7 ∆E3.6 ∆E2.2 ∆E4.2 ∆E1.4 ∆E3.4 ∆E5.5 ∆EColorChecker Apple iPhone Air: 3.56 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 7.72 ∆E22.8 ∆E28.8 ∆E23.6 ∆E22.6 ∆E25.3 ∆E27.6 ∆E30.4 ∆E19.2 ∆E21.5 ∆E20.5 ∆E24.7 ∆E32.6 ∆E18.9 ∆E24.6 ∆E16.9 ∆E21.3 ∆E22.2 ∆E25 ∆E22.4 ∆E22.5 ∆E25 ∆E24.6 ∆E22.2 ∆E13.9 ∆EColorChecker Apple iPhone Air: 23.29 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 32.56 ∆E
Apple iPhone AirApple iPhone Air
配件和保修 - Care+ 专业版价格iPhone Air 只配备了一条 USB-C 连接线（两端）。
在德国的保修期为 12 个月，这并不影响 零售商的保修期.AppleCare+ 是一种保险套餐，其价格因保险范围而异。一次性支付 139.99 美元，为期一年，也可按月支付 13.99 美元。
输入设备和操作 - iPhone Air 和 Face ID 在生物识别安全方面，iPhone Air 依靠 Face ID 进行 3D 面部识别，其高水平的安全性和成功率以及快速解锁给我们留下了深刻印象。触觉引擎提供触觉反馈，反馈精确而直接，令人愉悦。
电容式触摸屏能快速、准确地响应输入。此外，手机背面还提供触摸输入功能，但必须首先在设置中激活。操作按钮和相机按钮的功能与 iPhone 完全相同。
显示屏--明亮的新型中型 OLED 面板 子像素结构从技术上讲，iPhone Air 的显示屏与 17 Pro 相似，但 6.5 英寸（16.51 厘米）的显示屏稍大一些。它拥有相同的亮度水平，在我们的测试中，在缩小的白色区域（APL18）上，它的亮度达到了 3,085 cd/m²。
PWM 频率最高可达 480 Hz，还包括可选的脉冲平滑功能。与 17 Pro类似，其效果仅限于低亮度时的平缓振幅。这意味着对此类问题敏感的人仍会感到一些不适。
1067cd/m²1052cd/m²1055cd/m²1071cd/m²1060cd/m²1063cd/m²1074cd/m²1069cd/m²1066cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1074 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1064.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.17 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %Center on Battery: 1060 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.2CCT: 6519 K
Apple iPhone AirOLED, 2736x1260, 6.5"Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeDynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"Apple iPhone 17 ProOLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"Motorola Edge 60 ProP-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"Screen-44%-5%12%Brightness middle (cd/m²)10601399 32%1059 0%1099 4%Brightness (cd/m²)10641371 29%1060 0%1073 1%Brightness Distribution (%)9894 -4%99 1%91 -7%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.33.9 -200%1.3 -0%1.25 4%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *36.3 -110%3.6 -20%1.68 44%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.92.1 -11%2.1 -11%1.4 26%Gamma2.2 100%2.01 109%2.2 100%2.031 108%CCT6519 100%6506 100%6542 99%6403 102%* ... smaller is better
Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
3085 cd/m² Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
3044 cd/m² -1%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2714 cd/m² -12%Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
3027 cd/m² Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2997 cd/m² -1%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2875 cd/m² -5%
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 HzAmplitude: 16.09 %Secondary Frequency: 480 HzThe display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8077 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25 %
50 %
75 %
100 %以固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。
正如使用 CalMAN 进行的常规分析所显示的那样，iPhone Air 的面板开箱后校准良好，没有出现色彩过饱和或欠饱和的情况。
灰度（真实色调：关闭，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（真实色调：关闭，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（真实色调：关闭，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（真实色调：关闭，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.563 ms rise↘ 0.6245 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5315 ms rise↘ 0.624 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).
在室外，只要允许环境光线传感器控制亮度，iPhone Air 依然清晰易读。如果没有环境光线传感器，面板的最大亮度可达 851 cd/m²。
可视角度稳定性极佳，在广视角下亮度仅略有下降。
户外活动
视角稳定性性能 - iPhone Air 的图形处理器较弱名义上，Air 使用 Apple A19 Pro、的 SoC。Geekbench 分数略低的原因可能是散热降低，而散热降低的时间相对较早。这在安兔兔测试中更为明显，Air 的成绩落后于 iPhone 17落后于 iPhone 17 A19 芯片组.
不过，在日常情况下，这一点几乎不会被察觉，系统也能流畅运行。
Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | AImark | Geekbench AI Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreAverage Apple A19 Pro (3785 - 3888, n=4)
3840 Points +1%Apple iPhone 17 ProApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
3803 Points 0%Apple iPhone AirApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, 12288
3785 Points Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3105 Points -18%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=210, last 2 years)
1788 Points -53%Motorola Edge 60 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1457 Points -62% Multi-CoreApple iPhone 17 ProApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
10097 Points +6%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
9941 Points +5%Average Apple A19 Pro (9509 - 10105, n=4)
9932 Points +4%Apple iPhone AirApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, 12288
9509 Points Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=210, last 2 years)
5228 Points -45%Motorola Edge 60 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4616 Points -51%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 ProApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
2806319 Points +37%Average Apple A19 Pro (2053750 - 2806319, n=3)
2496587 Points +22%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2126237 Points +4%Apple iPhone AirApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, 12288
2053750 Points Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=147, last 2 years)
1501680 Points -27%Motorola Edge 60 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1409057 Points -31%AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 ProApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
37423 Points +5%Average Apple A19 Pro (35571 - 37611, n=3)
36868 Points +4%Apple iPhone AirApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, 12288
35571 Points Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=117, last 2 years)
25168 Points -29%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1922 Points -95%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5Apple iPhone AirApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, 12288
5210 Points Average Apple A19 Pro (5143 - 5210, n=3)
5169 Points -1%Apple iPhone 17 ProApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
5143 Points -1%Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=67, last 2 years)
758 Points -85% Half Precision NPU 1.5Apple iPhone 17 ProApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
35890 Points +2%Average Apple A19 Pro (35152 - 36297, n=3)
35780 Points +2%Apple iPhone AirApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, 12288
35152 Points Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=67, last 2 years)
3114 Points -91% Quantized NPU 1.5Apple iPhone 17 ProApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
49889 Points +4%Average Apple A19 Pro (48126 - 49889, n=3)
48948 Points +2%Apple iPhone AirApple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, 12288
48126 Points Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=67, last 2 years)
4565 Points -91%
iPhone Air 的 A19 Pro GPU仅使用五个内核，而不是 iPhone 17 Pro 的六个内核。 iPhone 17 Pro.因此，性能也较差。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6955 Points +46%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
5928 Points +24%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
4762 Points Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3060 Points -36%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6755 Points +37%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
6001 Points +21%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
4945 Points Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3110 Points -37%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27493 Points +17%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
26286 Points +12%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
23402 Points Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10786 Points -54%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12100 Points +20%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
11442 Points +13%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
10088 Points Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5058 Points -50%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12871 Points +16%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
12194 Points +10%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
11065 Points Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4946 Points -55%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2630 Points +48%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2497 Points +41%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
1772 Points Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1218 Points -31%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2698 Points +32%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2595 Points +27%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2051 Points Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1222 Points -40%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps 0%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
754 fps +32%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
714 fps +25%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
573 fps Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
460 fps -20%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps 0%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
427 fps +33%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
415 fps +29%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
321 fps Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps -30%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps 0%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
303 fps +30%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
286 fps +23%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
233 fps Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -22%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps +32%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps 0%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
210 fps +28%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
180 fps +10%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
164 fps Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -35%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +8%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps 0%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +69%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
87 fps +34%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
65 fps Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -18%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps +70%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps 0%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
276 fps +42%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
253 fps +30%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
195 fps Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
141 fps -28%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps +79%Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
37 fps +32%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
28 fps Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -14%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average Apple A19 Pro (327 - 358, n=3)
338 Points +4%Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
329.095 Points +1%Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0)
326.566 Points Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72)
298.774 Points -9%Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=146, last 2 years)
156.8 Points -52%Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
111.429 Points -66%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
621 runs/min +4%Average Apple A19 Pro (598 - 643, n=3)
621 runs/min +4%Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0)
598 runs/min Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72)
585 runs/min -2%Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=117, last 2 years)
234 runs/min -61%Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
158 runs/min -74%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
41.7 runs/min +2%Average Apple A19 Pro (40.7 - 42.8, n=3)
41.7 runs/min +2%Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0)
40.7 runs/min Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72)
31.6 runs/min -22%Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=124, last 2 years)
14.8 runs/min -64%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
302 Points +2%Average Apple A19 Pro (297 - 306, n=3)
302 Points +2%Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0)
297 Points Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72)
239 Points -20%Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=142, last 2 years)
148.4 Points -50%Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
115 Points -61%Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
119218 Points +3%Average Apple A19 Pro (115463 - 121337, n=3)
118673 Points +3%Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0)
115463 Points Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72)
96997 Points -16%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=193, last 2 years)
49879 Points -57%Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
38258 Points -67%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=153, last 2 years)
1143 ms * -309%Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
1087.5 ms * -289%Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72)
377.3 ms * -35%Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0)
279.8 ms * Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
270.4 ms * +3%Average Apple A19 Pro (257 - 280, n=3)
269 ms * +4%* ... smaller is better
排放 - iPhone 采用单声道扬声器温度即使在负载情况下，iPhone Air 的表面温度也能保持安全，但在一些压力测试中，SoC 出现了明显的跳动。
Max. LoadIdle
40.8 °C38.4 °C32.3 °C 41.5 °C35.7 °C31.9 °C 41.4 °C36.5 °C32.4 °C
Maximum: 41.5 °CAverage: 36.8 °C
34 °C38.1 °C43.6 °C32 °C36.7 °C43.5 °C31 °C33.9 °C37.7 °C
Maximum: 43.6 °CAverage: 36.7 °C Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
27.9 °C28 °C27.4 °C 28 °C27.8 °C27 °C 27.6 °C27.5 °C27 °C
Maximum: 28 °CAverage: 27.6 °C
26.8 °C27.6 °C27.7 °C26.7 °C27.5 °C27.8 °C26.4 °C27.1 °C27 °C
Maximum: 27.8 °CAverage: 27.2 °C Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityApple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
99.8 % Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
99.7 % 0%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.3 % -54%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.2 % -58% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestApple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
73.5 % +11%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
66.1 % Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45.4 % -31%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.1 % -36% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityApple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
81.2 % Apple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
76.8 % -5%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.2 % -39%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.3 % -49% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityApple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
65.8 % +5%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
62.6 % Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.6 % -21%Motorola Edge 60 ProMali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.6 % -34% Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test StabilityApple iPhone 17 ProA19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
70.3 % +13%Apple iPhone AirA19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
62.2 %
Apple iPhone Air A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø20.6 (19.8-29.9) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.2 (17.6-38.8) Apple iPhone Air A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø59.9 (59.8-60) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø77.2 (63.3-136.8) Apple iPhone Air A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø24 (23.3-28.7) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22 (18.1-36.8) Apple iPhone Air A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø11.3 (10.2-16.2) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.4 (8.86-17.9) Apple iPhone Air A19 Pro 5-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability: Ø8.38 (8-12.9)
发言人iPhone Air 的听筒中只有一个扬声器，而且音量不大。音质尚可，但高音偏重。
与其他 iPhone 相似，Air 的蓝牙没有高分辨率编解码器，也没有 Auracast。通过 USB-C 有线连接可以获得最佳音质。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Apple iPhone Air audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 3,149 毫安时的超薄电池耗电量测试证明，iPhone Air 的耗电量并不突出。以最大 20 瓦的功率充电，充满电大约需要一个半小时（50%：29 分钟）。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.13 / 0.24 WattIdle 0.52 / 1.95 / 1.98 Watt
Load
7.29 / 16.24 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone Air3149 mAhSamsung Galaxy S25 Edge3900 mAhApple iPhone 17 Pro3988 mAhMotorola Edge 60 Pro6000 mAhAverage Apple A19 Pro Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-7%-15%-36%2%3%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.520.59 -13%0.56 -8%1.3 -150%0.56 ?(0.52 - 0.6, n=3) -8%0.847 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=160, last 2 years) -63%Idle Average * (Watt)1.951.12 43%1.78 9%1.9 3%1.677 ?(1.3 - 1.95, n=3) 14%1.444 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 26%Idle Maximum * (Watt)1.981.19 40%1.89 5%2.4 -21%1.823 ?(1.6 - 1.98, n=3) 8%1.626 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 18%Load Average * (Watt)7.2914.72 -102%12.36 -70%8.6 -18%7.92 ?(4.1 - 12.4, n=3) -9%6.92 ?(2.3 - 15.4, n=136, last 2 years) 5%Load Maximum * (Watt)16.2416.57 -2%17.69 -9%14.9 8%15.1 ?(11.5 - 17.7, n=3) 7%11.2 ?(3.53 - 22, n=136, last 2 years) 31%* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Apple iPhone Air Apple A19 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.03 (0.792-16.2) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.74 (0.782-16.5) Apple iPhone Air Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.722 (0.695-0.772) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.79 (0.736-1.08)
功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Apple iPhone Air Apple A19 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.48 (4.72-15.2) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.79 (0.1391-16.5) Apple iPhone Air Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.722 (0.695-0.772) Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.79 (0.736-1.08)
电池寿命尽管 iPhone Air 的电池容量非常小，但它的续航时间却出奇地长，足够你中度使用一整天。如果不是这样，就不要离最近的电源太远。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 26.0.1)
15h 25min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Apple iPhone Air3149 mAh
15.4 h Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge3900 mAh
17.9 h Apple iPhone 17 Pro3988 mAh
24.2 h Motorola Edge 60 Pro6000 mAh
22.4 h
Notebookcheck 总体评分评测：Apple iPhone AiriPhone Air 采用了梦幻般的超薄设计，配备了钛金属边框，但在其别致的外表下却隐藏着迟缓的 USB 2.0 接口、普通的单摄像头，而且电池在中午时就会耗尽。
Back to the verdict
Apple iPhone Air
- 10/30/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis92%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device96%
Connectivity55 / 69 → 79%
Weight92%
Battery90%
Display92%
Games Performance40 / 55 → 72%
Application Performance94 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance95%
Temperature89%
Noise100%
Audio75 / 90 → 83%
Camera81%
Average83%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions89.5%Materials67.5%Packaging95%Power Use95.3%Repairability76%Software Updates83.5% Total Sustainability Score: 84.5%
可能的替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.86.8%Apple iPhone AirApple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 5-Core GPU ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $79.00Apple iPhone Air MagSafe Bat...2. $1,429.00iPhone Air Space Black, 512GB3. $1,189.00iPhone Air Space Black 256GBList Price: 1449€165 gApple 512GB NVMe6.50"2736x1260463 PPIOLED
2.88.3%Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $1,099.99Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Phon...2. $7.99firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...3. $6.98amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou...List Price: 1249€163 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"3120x1440395 PPIDynamic AMOLED 2X
3.89.9%Apple iPhone 17 ProApple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $59.00Apple iPhone 17 Pro TechWove...2. $48.00Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone...3. $9.88Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...List Price: 1549€206 gApple 512GB NVMe6.30"2622x1206458 PPIOLED
4.81.5%Motorola Edge 60 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $11.99Ibywind For Motorola Edge 60...2. $6.98Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...3. $6.59Aiziki 2 Pack for Motorola E...List Price: 600 Euro186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220446 PPIP-OLED
More articles related to this deviceApple iPhone Air (iPhone 17 Series)News•iPhone Air 的失败可能意味着小米和 vivo 超薄智能手机的终结 |News•一个时代的终结：Apple 有望取代三星，成为全球智能手机领导者 |News•Apple iPhone Air 在 DxOMark 相机分析中落后于 iPhone 15 和谷歌 Pixel 8 |News•Apple iPhone 17 Pro 金色系列推出三款奢华设计，售价高达 88,210 美元 |News•iPhone Air 停产令 iPhone Air 2 发布日期成疑 |News•Apple 开始以部分高价销售 iPhone 17 (Pro) 和 iPhone Air 的替换零件 |News•牺牲设计，提升性能：Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 评论 |Review•刷新电池使用时间记录 -Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 智能手机评测 |News•Apple iPhone 17、iPhone Air 和 iPhone 17 Pro Max 在 DxOMark 显示屏分析中未能进入前 20 名 |News•2025 年 iPhone 与 2015 年 iPhone 的对比：据报道，10 年后，iPhone 17 的多核和 GPU 性能将分别提高 1000... |Review•Apple iPhone 17 Pro 评测 - 更快、更长、更远。这就够了吗？ |News•Apple iPhone 17（Pro）的销售情况远好于 iPhone 16（Pro），因为 iPhone Air 在苦苦挣扎 |News•iPhone 17 Pro 的创新前置摄像头在 DxOMark 评测中击败所有竞争对手 |News•Apple iPhone 17 Pro：最小巧的旗舰手机之一越来越重 |News•iPhone 14 Pro 和 iPhone 17 Pro 对比 |News•FineWoven 灾难之后：Apple 官方 TechWoven iPhone 17 Pro 保护壳面临耐用性测试 |News•Apple iPhone 17 评论：值得升级的 iPhone 16 |Review•Apple iPhone 17 智能手机评测--年度最佳 iPhone 难以置信地接近 iPhone Pro ...
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Please share our article, every link counts!
Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 174 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 694771 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: